UK Selects Industry Teams to Develop Loyal Wingman Drone Prototypes for Apache Attack Helicopters
{loadposition bannertop}
{loadposition sidebarpub}
The UK Ministry of Defence has moved Project NYX into a new development phase, commissioning seven UK-based companies to design loyal wingman drones for Apache attack helicopters. The program aims to expand combat mass, improve survivability, and give the British Army aviation greater flexibility in contested airspace.
On January 24, 2026, the UK Ministry of Defence announced that Project NYX has advanced into a new development phase, commissioning seven UK-based industry partners to design and prototype next-generation “loyal wingman” drones. These uncrewed aerial systems are intended to operate in close coordination with British Army Apache attack helicopters, augmenting mission effectiveness and resilience on the modern battlefield. The initiative reflects the Ministry’s broader strategic investment in uncrewed and autonomous capabilities aimed at increasing combat mass, enhancing survivability, and maintaining operational tempo in highly contested environments.
Follow Army Recognition on Google News at this link
The UK has advanced Project NYX into its prototype phase, tasking seven industry teams to develop loyal wingman drones designed to operate alongside British Army Apache attack helicopters and enhance battlefield effectiveness (Picture Source: British Army)
Project NYX has advanced into a pivotal prototype development phase, with seven UK-based industry partners, Anduril, BAE Systems, Leonardo, Lockheed Martin UK, Syos, Tekever, and Thales, tasked with designing loyal wingman uncrewed aerial systems (UAS) to operate alongside British Army Apache AH-64E attack helicopters. These partners, blending established defence primes with innovative technology specialists, have cleared a rigorous pre-qualification process concluded late 2025 and now advance designs for complex missions including reconnaissance, strike, target acquisition, and electronic warfare. Down-selection to four teams is slated for March 2026, leading to contracts for concept demonstrators and initial operational capability targeted for 2030.
Project NYX is built around manned–unmanned teaming tailored to rotary-wing operations, with the drones expected to perform missions that the Ministry associates with reconnaissance and surveillance in contested areas, strike and target acquisition, and electronic warfare. The concept is explicitly “command rather than control”: Apache crews set intent and mission constraints, while onboard autonomy is expected to handle task execution and adapt within those bounds. That phrasing signals an emphasis on reducing cockpit task saturation and speeding decision cycles, rather than adding another aircraft that must be continuously flown by remote control.
The integration of loyal wingman systems with Apache helicopter mission workflows presents a key engineering challenge, requiring seamless interoperability to enhance tactical utility without introducing operational complexity. That usually means secure, resilient networking; a datalink architecture that tolerates intermittent connectivity; and a human–machine interface that turns additional sensor feeds into actionable cues instead of raw video overload. In electronic warfare-heavy environments, the edge cases become the baseline: jamming, spoofing, low bandwidth, and degraded GPS all push designers toward autonomy that can continue mission execution when the link is delayed, denied, or deliberately minimized for signature control.
The rotary-wing context makes these requirements sharper than in many fixed-wing “wingman” discussions. Apaches operate low and terrain-masked, where line-of-sight communications can be blocked by ridgelines and urban clutter, and where the helicopter’s survival often depends on minimizing exposure time above cover. A companion drone can change that geometry by “taking the look” forward, briefly exposing its sensors to build the picture, while the crewed platform stays masked and positions for a short, decisive pop-up or a standoff engagement. In that sense, the drone’s value is less about replacing the Apache and more about rebalancing risk across the formation.
The NYX is best understood as a kill-chain compression and risk-exchange effort. In the traditional pattern, an Apache formation must search, confirm, and engage while managing threats from short-range air defenses, man-portable systems, and increasingly pervasive surveillance. With wingmen, the formation can distribute sensing and electronic effects, potentially detecting emitters, classifying targets, and mapping threat sectors earlier in the approach. If the drone can contribute passive sensing, detecting hostile emissions without broadcasting, it also helps the force fight for information without giving away its own position. Where electronic warfare payloads are involved, a drone can shape the engagement by degrading hostile sensors or communications at the moment the crew needs a window to maneuver and strike. The Ministry’s language leaves payload choices open, but the mission set it describes aligns with these roles.
Survivability is the strategic center of gravity for this concept. A wingman that must be as survivable and maintainable as the crewed helicopter risks becoming too expensive to lose, undermining the logic of sending it into the most dangerous slices of airspace. Conversely, a drone that is sufficiently attritable can be used as a decoy, a forward scout, or a sacrificial emitter to force enemy air defenses to reveal themselves, preserving the Apache and its crew while still generating targeting opportunities. This is where doctrine, cost, and industrial design converge: the concept only scales if the force can accept losses of uncrewed platforms while keeping the manned fleet protected and available.
From a geostrategic perspective, Project NYX aligns with NATO’s broader set of challenges: operating near peer-level integrated air defense systems and dense electronic warfare, where air superiority may be local, temporary, or contested. Uncrewed collaborative systems are one way to restore combat mass and persistence without concentrating risk in a small number of high-value crewed platforms. They also offer a path to faster wartime adaptation because software-defined behaviors, autonomy updates, and modular payloads can evolve more rapidly than traditional platform upgrade cycles, assuming the program secures the digital authority, cybersecurity assurance, and sustainment capacity needed to push changes at operational speed.
The Ministry states that the shortlist will be reduced to four suppliers in March 2026, with those teams offered contracts for research and development to produce a concept demonstrator, and with initial operational capability targeted for 2030. Those dates create clear analytical markers for judging progress: whether the selected teams can demonstrate robust autonomy under degraded communications, whether the Apache cockpit workload is measurably reduced rather than increased, and whether the system can contribute to targeting and electronic effects while keeping the crewed helicopter outside the most dangerous engagement zones.
Written by Teoman S. Nicanci – Defense Analyst, Army Recognition Group
Teoman S. Nicanci holds degrees in Political Science, Comparative and International Politics, and International Relations and Diplomacy from leading Belgian universities, with research focused on Russian strategic behavior, defense technology, and modern warfare. He is a defense analyst at Army Recognition, specializing in the global defense industry, military armament, and emerging defense technologies.
{loadposition bannertop}
{loadposition sidebarpub}
The UK Ministry of Defence has moved Project NYX into a new development phase, commissioning seven UK-based companies to design loyal wingman drones for Apache attack helicopters. The program aims to expand combat mass, improve survivability, and give the British Army aviation greater flexibility in contested airspace.
On January 24, 2026, the UK Ministry of Defence announced that Project NYX has advanced into a new development phase, commissioning seven UK-based industry partners to design and prototype next-generation “loyal wingman” drones. These uncrewed aerial systems are intended to operate in close coordination with British Army Apache attack helicopters, augmenting mission effectiveness and resilience on the modern battlefield. The initiative reflects the Ministry’s broader strategic investment in uncrewed and autonomous capabilities aimed at increasing combat mass, enhancing survivability, and maintaining operational tempo in highly contested environments.
The UK has advanced Project NYX into its prototype phase, tasking seven industry teams to develop loyal wingman drones designed to operate alongside British Army Apache attack helicopters and enhance battlefield effectiveness (Picture Source: British Army)
Project NYX has advanced into a pivotal prototype development phase, with seven UK-based industry partners, Anduril, BAE Systems, Leonardo, Lockheed Martin UK, Syos, Tekever, and Thales, tasked with designing loyal wingman uncrewed aerial systems (UAS) to operate alongside British Army Apache AH-64E attack helicopters. These partners, blending established defence primes with innovative technology specialists, have cleared a rigorous pre-qualification process concluded late 2025 and now advance designs for complex missions including reconnaissance, strike, target acquisition, and electronic warfare. Down-selection to four teams is slated for March 2026, leading to contracts for concept demonstrators and initial operational capability targeted for 2030.
Project NYX is built around manned–unmanned teaming tailored to rotary-wing operations, with the drones expected to perform missions that the Ministry associates with reconnaissance and surveillance in contested areas, strike and target acquisition, and electronic warfare. The concept is explicitly “command rather than control”: Apache crews set intent and mission constraints, while onboard autonomy is expected to handle task execution and adapt within those bounds. That phrasing signals an emphasis on reducing cockpit task saturation and speeding decision cycles, rather than adding another aircraft that must be continuously flown by remote control.
The integration of loyal wingman systems with Apache helicopter mission workflows presents a key engineering challenge, requiring seamless interoperability to enhance tactical utility without introducing operational complexity. That usually means secure, resilient networking; a datalink architecture that tolerates intermittent connectivity; and a human–machine interface that turns additional sensor feeds into actionable cues instead of raw video overload. In electronic warfare-heavy environments, the edge cases become the baseline: jamming, spoofing, low bandwidth, and degraded GPS all push designers toward autonomy that can continue mission execution when the link is delayed, denied, or deliberately minimized for signature control.
The rotary-wing context makes these requirements sharper than in many fixed-wing “wingman” discussions. Apaches operate low and terrain-masked, where line-of-sight communications can be blocked by ridgelines and urban clutter, and where the helicopter’s survival often depends on minimizing exposure time above cover. A companion drone can change that geometry by “taking the look” forward, briefly exposing its sensors to build the picture, while the crewed platform stays masked and positions for a short, decisive pop-up or a standoff engagement. In that sense, the drone’s value is less about replacing the Apache and more about rebalancing risk across the formation.
The NYX is best understood as a kill-chain compression and risk-exchange effort. In the traditional pattern, an Apache formation must search, confirm, and engage while managing threats from short-range air defenses, man-portable systems, and increasingly pervasive surveillance. With wingmen, the formation can distribute sensing and electronic effects, potentially detecting emitters, classifying targets, and mapping threat sectors earlier in the approach. If the drone can contribute passive sensing, detecting hostile emissions without broadcasting, it also helps the force fight for information without giving away its own position. Where electronic warfare payloads are involved, a drone can shape the engagement by degrading hostile sensors or communications at the moment the crew needs a window to maneuver and strike. The Ministry’s language leaves payload choices open, but the mission set it describes aligns with these roles.
Survivability is the strategic center of gravity for this concept. A wingman that must be as survivable and maintainable as the crewed helicopter risks becoming too expensive to lose, undermining the logic of sending it into the most dangerous slices of airspace. Conversely, a drone that is sufficiently attritable can be used as a decoy, a forward scout, or a sacrificial emitter to force enemy air defenses to reveal themselves, preserving the Apache and its crew while still generating targeting opportunities. This is where doctrine, cost, and industrial design converge: the concept only scales if the force can accept losses of uncrewed platforms while keeping the manned fleet protected and available.
From a geostrategic perspective, Project NYX aligns with NATO’s broader set of challenges: operating near peer-level integrated air defense systems and dense electronic warfare, where air superiority may be local, temporary, or contested. Uncrewed collaborative systems are one way to restore combat mass and persistence without concentrating risk in a small number of high-value crewed platforms. They also offer a path to faster wartime adaptation because software-defined behaviors, autonomy updates, and modular payloads can evolve more rapidly than traditional platform upgrade cycles, assuming the program secures the digital authority, cybersecurity assurance, and sustainment capacity needed to push changes at operational speed.
The Ministry states that the shortlist will be reduced to four suppliers in March 2026, with those teams offered contracts for research and development to produce a concept demonstrator, and with initial operational capability targeted for 2030. Those dates create clear analytical markers for judging progress: whether the selected teams can demonstrate robust autonomy under degraded communications, whether the Apache cockpit workload is measurably reduced rather than increased, and whether the system can contribute to targeting and electronic effects while keeping the crewed helicopter outside the most dangerous engagement zones.
Written by Teoman S. Nicanci – Defense Analyst, Army Recognition Group
Teoman S. Nicanci holds degrees in Political Science, Comparative and International Politics, and International Relations and Diplomacy from leading Belgian universities, with research focused on Russian strategic behavior, defense technology, and modern warfare. He is a defense analyst at Army Recognition, specializing in the global defense industry, military armament, and emerging defense technologies.
