US Air Force awards Dzyne Technologies $6 million for Long-Range Grasshopper autonomous cargo drone development
{loadposition bannertop}
{loadposition sidebarpub}
On August 6, 2026, the U.S. Air Force Research Laboratory awarded Dzyne Technologies a contract valued at over $6 million to advance the Long-Range Grasshopper autonomous aerial resupply system. The award funds engineering focused on extended flight endurance, modular payload integration, and autonomous navigation in GPS-denied environments for both turbine-powered and unpowered glider variants. This initiative evaluates the operational viability of expendable, air-launched cargo aircraft for routine logistics under Agile Combat Employment without exposing crewed transport aircraft to contested airspace.
The Long-Range Grasshopper adapts the baseline 500-lb payload glider architecture into a turbine-powered autonomous platform with a 1,700-lb maximum launch mass and a standoff flight radius exceeding 500 nautical miles. Building on 2024–2025 flight tests that validated mid-air engine ignition and parachute terminal descent, current development prioritizes manufacturing scalability and GPS-limited navigation to support routine consumption in contested theaters.
Related topic: US Air Force tests MightyFly Cento heavy cargo drone to improve autonomous military logistics
The Long-Range Grasshopper was developed because users of the original unpowered Grasshopper glider wanted to release the cargo much farther from the target, leading Dzyne and AFRL to integrate a turbine propulsion. (Picture source: Dzyne Technologies)
On August 6, 2026, the U.S. Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL) awarded Dzyne Technologies more than $6 million to continue the development of the Long-Range Grasshopper autonomous aerial resupply system, signaling an effort by the US Air Force to determine whether an expendable cargo aircraft can be used routinely in wartime. The contract covers both Long-Range Grasshopper units and the original Grasshopper glider, with work concentrated on extended range and endurance, modular payload integration, autonomous navigation in GPS-limited and GPS-denied environments, reliability, and manufacturability for larger-scale fielding. Nearly six years ago, the AFRL’s Center for Rapid Innovation conducted the first operational flight test at Dugway Proving Ground, Utah, in October 2021.
After that, multiple unpowered glider versions of the Grasshopper were fielded, but users soon asked that the glider could be released farther away from the target and still reach it. By 2024–2025, flight tests showed the Long-Range Grasshopper could be dropped from an aircraft, stabilize in the air, start its turbine engine after release, fly itself over long distances, and deliver a 500-lb payload accurately to a target. This variant also fits into the broader concept of Agile Combat Employment, where forces are spread across many small locations, creating frequent small delivery needs that are inefficient for large crewed transport aircraft to handle. The Grasshopper family is built around a fixed 500-lb payload: the unpowered Grasshopper weighs 1,075 lb at maximum launch weight, so its cargo represents 46.5% of its maximum launch mass. It measures 3.66 m in length, 1.47 m high, and 6.10 m across the wings, and it can reach 109 mph, or 176 km/h.
After release from a host aircraft, folding wings deploy, the glider transitions into stable autonomous flight, navigates toward a pre-programmed destination, and enters terminal descent before landing under parachute. The Long-Range Grasshopper increases the length to 4.06 m, height to 1.52 m, empty weight to 650 lb, and maximum launch weight to 1,700 lb. That additional mass is the cost of carrying the turbine, fuel, and associated systems needed to convert the final leg from a glide into a powered flight of more than 500 nautical miles. The trade is deliberate: the Long-Range model is not intended to move more cargo than Grasshopper, but to move the same load from a release point hundreds of miles farther from the receiving unit. The release-to-target distance subsequently becomes the principal performance metric, particularly when the objective is to keep the host aircraft outside the threat environment surrounding the destination.
The operational distinction from conventional airdrop is equally important. Traditional parachute delivery requires the crewed aircraft to reach a release point from which the load can descend into the designated area, leaving final accuracy strongly dependent on release geometry, wind, and parachute behavior. The Grasshopper instead turns the cargo package itself into an expendable aircraft: after separation, it can stabilize, maneuver, follow a planned route, correct its position, and approach the destination from a direction different from that of the host aircraft. The powered version extends this separation further by starting its turbine after release and continuing under power, allowing the host aircraft to perform the expensive and crew-intensive portion of the mission farther from the receiving unit.
Compared with conducting a conventional C-130 parachute drop, a Grasshopper can carry its 500-lb load autonomously for hundreds of miles after release and then descend by parachute at the destination. (Picture source: Dzyne Technologies)
Navigation under interference is therefore central to the concept. A Long-Range Grasshopper expected to cover hundreds of nautical miles cannot rely exclusively on satellite navigation if its mission happens in contested environments, which is why GPS-limited and GPS-denied navigation remains a funded engineering objective in 2026. At destination, the Long-Range Grasshopper transitions into parachute descent rather than requiring a runway, eliminating the need for taxiways, parking areas, aircraft turnaround, but also the recovery of the delivery vehicle. Its 500-lb capacity places it in a narrow but operationally relevant cargo class: ammunition, batteries, medical material, food, communications equipment and repair parts, leaving bulk fuel, vehicles, large engines, or major palletized loads for larger airlift.
The result is a division of labor in which C-5s, C-17s, and C-130s transport large payloads over long distances and Grasshoppers perform selected final deliveries where the cargo is small but the threat or infrastructure penalty is high. The difficult part of the concept is not carrying 500 lb once, but doing so repeatedly at a cost and production rate compatible with the deliberate consumption of the expendable glider. AFRL previously set a production objective near $40,000 for the baseline Grasshopper, which equals $80 of airframe cost per pound of cargo if the full 500-lb capacity is used. A ten-aircraft package would therefore represent $400,000 in gliders to deliver 5,000 lb, or 2.27 metric tons, while 100 full-load deliveries would consume $4 million in baseline airframes to move 50,000 lb, or 22.68 metric tons.
However, the $40,000 figure applies to the baseline glider and cannot simply be assigned to Long-Range Grasshopper because the powered aircraft adds a turbine, fuel system, flight-control requirements, and 625 lb of additional maximum launch mass. This changes the economic metric from the familiar cost per flight hour used for reusable transports to cost per completed delivery, because every successful Grasshopper sortie deliberately removes one aircraft from inventory. Reliability therefore has direct financial and operational consequences: a failed vehicle does not merely require maintenance; it destroys the delivery asset and can also remove the ammunition, medical supplies, or maintenance part it was carrying. Production capacity becomes equally important.
A force expending 20 unmanned cargo aircraft per day would consume 600 in a 30-day period; 50 per day would require 1,500 per month; 100 per day would require 3,000. The August 2026 emphasis on manufacturability is therefore not secondary to range development. If the Grasshopper is intended to become a recurring wartime logistics asset, the industrial system must be capable of replacing aircraft at a rate comparable to Ukraine’s current operational drone expenditure. Within the military drone logistics sector, the growth is being driven by the same shift toward dispersed forces and autonomous distribution. The market was valued at $8.7 billion in 2025 and is projected to reach $24.2 billion in 2034, an increase of $15.5 billion and 178.2%, with a 12.4% compound annual growth rate from 2026 through 2034.
Intermediate projections place the sector at $9.8 billion in 2026, $13.5 billion in 2029, $17.2 billion in 2031 and $21 billion in 2033, indicating that the forecast assumes sustained expansion rather than a single procurement surge due to the war in Ukraine. North America accounted for 38.5% of global revenue in 2025, equal to $3.35 billion, making it the largest regional market. Fixed-wing aircraft represented 42.3%, or $3.68 billion, and are projected to grow at 10.8% annually through 2034, while rotary-wing aircraft represented 35.7%, or $3.10 billion, with 11.2% annual growth. Hybrid configurations represented 22% and have a projected 16.9% CAGR, reflecting a logical demand for drones able to combine vertical take-off and landings with more efficient wing-borne cruise.
Interestingly, the market is simultaneously fragmenting by mission rather than converging on one aircraft category, with separate requirements for cargo, medical and ammunition supply, short-, medium- and long-range operations, and lightweight, medium and heavyweight payloads. In practical procurement terms, the differentiators are increasingly measurable factors such as payload-to-range performance, autonomy maturity, navigation under jamming, mission-completion reliability, C2 compatibility, integration with logistics databases and mission-planning software, total ownership cost and the ability to coordinate multiple unmanned aircraft rather than simply speed or maximum payload.
Moreover, the U.S. Air Force is already testing a heavier and reusable autonomous logistics tier above the Grasshopper through AFWERX Autonomy Prime, using modified Cessna 208B Grand Caravans operated by Joby Aviation and Reliable Robotics. Both companies received SBIR Phase II and Phase III contracts for autonomous flight trials, and their modified Caravans can now taxi, take off, navigate, and land without an onboard flight crew while carrying 1,200 lb over roughly 1,150 miles. During Agile Flag 24-3 from August 5-9, 2024, the 23rd Wing from Moody AFB and 9th Reconnaissance Wing from Beale AFB used the autonomous aircraft across dispersed locations in California and the western United States. Joby and Reliable Robotics completed 47 flights totaling more than 6,600 miles, which means the average mission exceeded 140.4 miles.
The operational problem was specific: conventional cargo aircraft were not always available when units needed aircraft parts to keep combat aircraft flying, creating a choice between assigning an expensive cargo sortie or delaying delivery. The cost figures quantify that mismatch. FY2023 DoD operating costs were $7,671 per hour for a C-130J and $20,941 for a C-17A, compared with $1,200-$1,600 for an autonomous Cessna 208B. At the lower $1,200 figure, the Caravan costs 84.4% less per flight hour than the C-130J and 94.3% less than the C-17A; at $1,600, the reductions remain 79.1% and 92.4%. Those comparisons do not account for the radically different payloads of the aircraft, but that is precisely the allocation problem the AFRL is examining with the Grasshopper: small cargo should not automatically require the same transport aircraft needed for large components, engines, and weapons.
The Grasshopper’s expendable delivery model means every successful resupply mission consumes one drone, shifting the logistics burden from recovering and maintaining the vehicle to continuously manufacturing replacements at a rate comparable to operational use. (Picture source: Dzyne Technologies)
For the U.S. Air Force, the consequence of these unmanned aircraft is the creation of additional logistics echelons that can separate cargo according to weight, distance, urgency, and threat. A 1,200-lb autonomous Caravan can take smaller point-to-point movements that do not justify a larger cargo aircraft; a 500-lb Long-Range Grasshopper can take a still smaller load through the final segment where crew exposure or the absence of a runway makes conventional delivery inefficient; C-130Js and C-17As remain available for engines, weapons, large components, and loads that physically exceed the smaller aircraft’s capacity. This matters under the service’s Agile Combat Employment (ACE) because dispersal changes the mathematics of supply.
Instead of one large base receiving consolidated shipments, several operating locations may each require a different component at a different hour, so the number of logistics legs rises even if the total cargo tonnage does not. The 47 autonomous AGILE FLAG flights provide a practical example of how those additional legs can be generated without waiting for conventional cargo aircraft to become available. The impact on combat aviation is indirect but measurable: faster movement of maintenance-critical parts can reduce the period in which a fighter jet remains unavailable for lack of a component, while shifting small shipments away from conventional transports frees expensive airlift hours for missions that require their capacity.
Autonomy also removes the onboard flight crew from repetitive cargo movements, but it does not eliminate manpower requirements for maintenance, loading, ground handling, command-and-control, airspace coordination, and mission supervision. The Grasshopper adds a different constraint because its expendability substitutes manufacturing capacity for aircraft recovery: reusable autonomous Caravans must be maintained and turned around, while Grasshoppers must be continuously replenished from the factory.
A mature Air Force architecture would therefore combine large crewed airlift for mass movement, reusable autonomous aircraft for lower-volume intra-theater distribution, helicopters for runway-independent access, and expendable vehicles for the most exposed final leg. The practical value is increased effective airlift capacity without using the same aircraft for every cargo class, but the concept only works if autonomous navigation remains reliable under interference, mission-completion rates remain high, command-and-control can handle larger numbers of unmanned aircraft, and industry can produce expendable vehicles at rates comparable to wartime consumption.
Written by Jérôme Brahy
Jérôme Brahy is a defense analyst and documentalist at Army Recognition. He specializes in naval modernization, aviation, drones, armored vehicles, and artillery, with a focus on strategic developments in the United States, China, Ukraine, Russia, Türkiye, and Belgium. His analyses go beyond the facts, providing context, identifying key actors, and explaining why defense news matters on a global scale.
Explore More Defense News
• Land Defense News• Naval Defense News• Defense Aerospace News
{loadposition bannertop}
{loadposition sidebarpub}
On August 6, 2026, the U.S. Air Force Research Laboratory awarded Dzyne Technologies a contract valued at over $6 million to advance the Long-Range Grasshopper autonomous aerial resupply system. The award funds engineering focused on extended flight endurance, modular payload integration, and autonomous navigation in GPS-denied environments for both turbine-powered and unpowered glider variants. This initiative evaluates the operational viability of expendable, air-launched cargo aircraft for routine logistics under Agile Combat Employment without exposing crewed transport aircraft to contested airspace.
The Long-Range Grasshopper adapts the baseline 500-lb payload glider architecture into a turbine-powered autonomous platform with a 1,700-lb maximum launch mass and a standoff flight radius exceeding 500 nautical miles. Building on 2024–2025 flight tests that validated mid-air engine ignition and parachute terminal descent, current development prioritizes manufacturing scalability and GPS-limited navigation to support routine consumption in contested theaters.
Related topic: US Air Force tests MightyFly Cento heavy cargo drone to improve autonomous military logistics
The Long-Range Grasshopper was developed because users of the original unpowered Grasshopper glider wanted to release the cargo much farther from the target, leading Dzyne and AFRL to integrate a turbine propulsion. (Picture source: Dzyne Technologies)
On August 6, 2026, the U.S. Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL) awarded Dzyne Technologies more than $6 million to continue the development of the Long-Range Grasshopper autonomous aerial resupply system, signaling an effort by the US Air Force to determine whether an expendable cargo aircraft can be used routinely in wartime. The contract covers both Long-Range Grasshopper units and the original Grasshopper glider, with work concentrated on extended range and endurance, modular payload integration, autonomous navigation in GPS-limited and GPS-denied environments, reliability, and manufacturability for larger-scale fielding. Nearly six years ago, the AFRL’s Center for Rapid Innovation conducted the first operational flight test at Dugway Proving Ground, Utah, in October 2021.
After that, multiple unpowered glider versions of the Grasshopper were fielded, but users soon asked that the glider could be released farther away from the target and still reach it. By 2024–2025, flight tests showed the Long-Range Grasshopper could be dropped from an aircraft, stabilize in the air, start its turbine engine after release, fly itself over long distances, and deliver a 500-lb payload accurately to a target. This variant also fits into the broader concept of Agile Combat Employment, where forces are spread across many small locations, creating frequent small delivery needs that are inefficient for large crewed transport aircraft to handle. The Grasshopper family is built around a fixed 500-lb payload: the unpowered Grasshopper weighs 1,075 lb at maximum launch weight, so its cargo represents 46.5% of its maximum launch mass. It measures 3.66 m in length, 1.47 m high, and 6.10 m across the wings, and it can reach 109 mph, or 176 km/h.
After release from a host aircraft, folding wings deploy, the glider transitions into stable autonomous flight, navigates toward a pre-programmed destination, and enters terminal descent before landing under parachute. The Long-Range Grasshopper increases the length to 4.06 m, height to 1.52 m, empty weight to 650 lb, and maximum launch weight to 1,700 lb. That additional mass is the cost of carrying the turbine, fuel, and associated systems needed to convert the final leg from a glide into a powered flight of more than 500 nautical miles. The trade is deliberate: the Long-Range model is not intended to move more cargo than Grasshopper, but to move the same load from a release point hundreds of miles farther from the receiving unit. The release-to-target distance subsequently becomes the principal performance metric, particularly when the objective is to keep the host aircraft outside the threat environment surrounding the destination.
The operational distinction from conventional airdrop is equally important. Traditional parachute delivery requires the crewed aircraft to reach a release point from which the load can descend into the designated area, leaving final accuracy strongly dependent on release geometry, wind, and parachute behavior. The Grasshopper instead turns the cargo package itself into an expendable aircraft: after separation, it can stabilize, maneuver, follow a planned route, correct its position, and approach the destination from a direction different from that of the host aircraft. The powered version extends this separation further by starting its turbine after release and continuing under power, allowing the host aircraft to perform the expensive and crew-intensive portion of the mission farther from the receiving unit.
Compared with conducting a conventional C-130 parachute drop, a Grasshopper can carry its 500-lb load autonomously for hundreds of miles after release and then descend by parachute at the destination. (Picture source: Dzyne Technologies)
Navigation under interference is therefore central to the concept. A Long-Range Grasshopper expected to cover hundreds of nautical miles cannot rely exclusively on satellite navigation if its mission happens in contested environments, which is why GPS-limited and GPS-denied navigation remains a funded engineering objective in 2026. At destination, the Long-Range Grasshopper transitions into parachute descent rather than requiring a runway, eliminating the need for taxiways, parking areas, aircraft turnaround, but also the recovery of the delivery vehicle. Its 500-lb capacity places it in a narrow but operationally relevant cargo class: ammunition, batteries, medical material, food, communications equipment and repair parts, leaving bulk fuel, vehicles, large engines, or major palletized loads for larger airlift.
The result is a division of labor in which C-5s, C-17s, and C-130s transport large payloads over long distances and Grasshoppers perform selected final deliveries where the cargo is small but the threat or infrastructure penalty is high. The difficult part of the concept is not carrying 500 lb once, but doing so repeatedly at a cost and production rate compatible with the deliberate consumption of the expendable glider. AFRL previously set a production objective near $40,000 for the baseline Grasshopper, which equals $80 of airframe cost per pound of cargo if the full 500-lb capacity is used. A ten-aircraft package would therefore represent $400,000 in gliders to deliver 5,000 lb, or 2.27 metric tons, while 100 full-load deliveries would consume $4 million in baseline airframes to move 50,000 lb, or 22.68 metric tons.
However, the $40,000 figure applies to the baseline glider and cannot simply be assigned to Long-Range Grasshopper because the powered aircraft adds a turbine, fuel system, flight-control requirements, and 625 lb of additional maximum launch mass. This changes the economic metric from the familiar cost per flight hour used for reusable transports to cost per completed delivery, because every successful Grasshopper sortie deliberately removes one aircraft from inventory. Reliability therefore has direct financial and operational consequences: a failed vehicle does not merely require maintenance; it destroys the delivery asset and can also remove the ammunition, medical supplies, or maintenance part it was carrying. Production capacity becomes equally important.
A force expending 20 unmanned cargo aircraft per day would consume 600 in a 30-day period; 50 per day would require 1,500 per month; 100 per day would require 3,000. The August 2026 emphasis on manufacturability is therefore not secondary to range development. If the Grasshopper is intended to become a recurring wartime logistics asset, the industrial system must be capable of replacing aircraft at a rate comparable to Ukraine’s current operational drone expenditure. Within the military drone logistics sector, the growth is being driven by the same shift toward dispersed forces and autonomous distribution. The market was valued at $8.7 billion in 2025 and is projected to reach $24.2 billion in 2034, an increase of $15.5 billion and 178.2%, with a 12.4% compound annual growth rate from 2026 through 2034.
Intermediate projections place the sector at $9.8 billion in 2026, $13.5 billion in 2029, $17.2 billion in 2031 and $21 billion in 2033, indicating that the forecast assumes sustained expansion rather than a single procurement surge due to the war in Ukraine. North America accounted for 38.5% of global revenue in 2025, equal to $3.35 billion, making it the largest regional market. Fixed-wing aircraft represented 42.3%, or $3.68 billion, and are projected to grow at 10.8% annually through 2034, while rotary-wing aircraft represented 35.7%, or $3.10 billion, with 11.2% annual growth. Hybrid configurations represented 22% and have a projected 16.9% CAGR, reflecting a logical demand for drones able to combine vertical take-off and landings with more efficient wing-borne cruise.
Interestingly, the market is simultaneously fragmenting by mission rather than converging on one aircraft category, with separate requirements for cargo, medical and ammunition supply, short-, medium- and long-range operations, and lightweight, medium and heavyweight payloads. In practical procurement terms, the differentiators are increasingly measurable factors such as payload-to-range performance, autonomy maturity, navigation under jamming, mission-completion reliability, C2 compatibility, integration with logistics databases and mission-planning software, total ownership cost and the ability to coordinate multiple unmanned aircraft rather than simply speed or maximum payload.
Moreover, the U.S. Air Force is already testing a heavier and reusable autonomous logistics tier above the Grasshopper through AFWERX Autonomy Prime, using modified Cessna 208B Grand Caravans operated by Joby Aviation and Reliable Robotics. Both companies received SBIR Phase II and Phase III contracts for autonomous flight trials, and their modified Caravans can now taxi, take off, navigate, and land without an onboard flight crew while carrying 1,200 lb over roughly 1,150 miles. During Agile Flag 24-3 from August 5-9, 2024, the 23rd Wing from Moody AFB and 9th Reconnaissance Wing from Beale AFB used the autonomous aircraft across dispersed locations in California and the western United States. Joby and Reliable Robotics completed 47 flights totaling more than 6,600 miles, which means the average mission exceeded 140.4 miles.
The operational problem was specific: conventional cargo aircraft were not always available when units needed aircraft parts to keep combat aircraft flying, creating a choice between assigning an expensive cargo sortie or delaying delivery. The cost figures quantify that mismatch. FY2023 DoD operating costs were $7,671 per hour for a C-130J and $20,941 for a C-17A, compared with $1,200-$1,600 for an autonomous Cessna 208B. At the lower $1,200 figure, the Caravan costs 84.4% less per flight hour than the C-130J and 94.3% less than the C-17A; at $1,600, the reductions remain 79.1% and 92.4%. Those comparisons do not account for the radically different payloads of the aircraft, but that is precisely the allocation problem the AFRL is examining with the Grasshopper: small cargo should not automatically require the same transport aircraft needed for large components, engines, and weapons.
The Grasshopper’s expendable delivery model means every successful resupply mission consumes one drone, shifting the logistics burden from recovering and maintaining the vehicle to continuously manufacturing replacements at a rate comparable to operational use. (Picture source: Dzyne Technologies)
For the U.S. Air Force, the consequence of these unmanned aircraft is the creation of additional logistics echelons that can separate cargo according to weight, distance, urgency, and threat. A 1,200-lb autonomous Caravan can take smaller point-to-point movements that do not justify a larger cargo aircraft; a 500-lb Long-Range Grasshopper can take a still smaller load through the final segment where crew exposure or the absence of a runway makes conventional delivery inefficient; C-130Js and C-17As remain available for engines, weapons, large components, and loads that physically exceed the smaller aircraft’s capacity. This matters under the service’s Agile Combat Employment (ACE) because dispersal changes the mathematics of supply.
Instead of one large base receiving consolidated shipments, several operating locations may each require a different component at a different hour, so the number of logistics legs rises even if the total cargo tonnage does not. The 47 autonomous AGILE FLAG flights provide a practical example of how those additional legs can be generated without waiting for conventional cargo aircraft to become available. The impact on combat aviation is indirect but measurable: faster movement of maintenance-critical parts can reduce the period in which a fighter jet remains unavailable for lack of a component, while shifting small shipments away from conventional transports frees expensive airlift hours for missions that require their capacity.
Autonomy also removes the onboard flight crew from repetitive cargo movements, but it does not eliminate manpower requirements for maintenance, loading, ground handling, command-and-control, airspace coordination, and mission supervision. The Grasshopper adds a different constraint because its expendability substitutes manufacturing capacity for aircraft recovery: reusable autonomous Caravans must be maintained and turned around, while Grasshoppers must be continuously replenished from the factory.
A mature Air Force architecture would therefore combine large crewed airlift for mass movement, reusable autonomous aircraft for lower-volume intra-theater distribution, helicopters for runway-independent access, and expendable vehicles for the most exposed final leg. The practical value is increased effective airlift capacity without using the same aircraft for every cargo class, but the concept only works if autonomous navigation remains reliable under interference, mission-completion rates remain high, command-and-control can handle larger numbers of unmanned aircraft, and industry can produce expendable vehicles at rates comparable to wartime consumption.
Written by Jérôme Brahy
Jérôme Brahy is a defense analyst and documentalist at Army Recognition. He specializes in naval modernization, aviation, drones, armored vehicles, and artillery, with a focus on strategic developments in the United States, China, Ukraine, Russia, Türkiye, and Belgium. His analyses go beyond the facts, providing context, identifying key actors, and explaining why defense news matters on a global scale.
Explore More Defense News
• Land Defense News
• Naval Defense News
• Defense Aerospace News
